Pharmacodynamic Targets
Literature-based PK/PD targets used to optimize antibiotic dosing. Antibiotics are classified into three pharmacodynamic patterns based on the relationship between drug exposure and bacterial killing.
Three PK/PD Killing Patterns
- Time-dependent (%fT>MIC): Efficacy correlates with the percentage of the dosing interval that free drug concentrations remain above the MIC. Prolonged or continuous infusions maximize this parameter. Applies to beta-lactams.
- AUC/MIC-dependent: Efficacy correlates with the ratio of the 24-hour area under the concentration–time curve to the MIC. Total daily exposure matters more than peak or duration. Applies to vancomycin, fluoroquinolones, daptomycin, linezolid.
- Concentration-dependent (Cmax/MIC): Efficacy correlates with the ratio of peak concentration to MIC. Higher peaks drive faster bactericidal activity. Applies to aminoglycosides.
Table 1: Time-Dependent Killing (%fT>MIC)
Beta-lactam antibiotics — penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems
| Drug |
Class |
Bacteriostatic Target |
Bactericidal Target |
Ref |
| Ampicillin |
Penicillin |
30% |
50% |
[1] |
| Penicillin G |
Penicillin |
30% |
50% |
[1] |
| Piperacillin/Tazobactam |
Penicillin + BLI |
30% |
50% |
[1] |
| Cefazolin |
Cephalosporin (1st gen) |
35–40% |
50–60% |
[1] |
| Ceftazidime |
Cephalosporin (3rd gen) |
40% |
60–70% |
[1] |
| Cefepime |
Cephalosporin (4th gen) |
35–40% |
60% |
[1], [6] |
| Ceftolozane/Tazobactam |
Cephalosporin + BLI |
24–31% |
32–42% |
[7] |
| Cefiderocol |
Siderophore cephalosporin |
58–64% |
73–75% |
[8] |
| Meropenem |
Carbapenem |
20% |
40% |
[1], [9] |
Note: Targets expressed as %fT>MIC (percentage of dosing interval that free drug concentration exceeds the MIC). Carbapenems achieve bactericidal activity at lower %fT>MIC than penicillins or cephalosporins due to a more rapid rate of killing.
Table 2: AUC/MIC-Dependent Killing
Vancomycin, fluoroquinolones, daptomycin, linezolid
| Drug |
PK/PD Target |
Clinical Goal |
Ref |
| Vancomycin |
AUC24/MIC 400–600 |
Serious MRSA infections; assumes MIC ≤1 mcg/mL |
[5] |
| Daptomycin |
AUC24/MIC ≥666 |
1-log bactericidal kill in murine thigh model |
[10] |
| Linezolid |
AUC24/MIC 80–120 |
Bacteriostatic; keep AUC24 <400 for safety (thrombocytopenia) |
[11] |
| Levofloxacin (Gram-negative) |
AUC24/MIC ≥125 |
Gram-negative infections |
[12] |
| Levofloxacin (Gram-positive) |
fAUC24/MIC ≥34 |
S. pneumoniae eradication |
[13] |
| Ciprofloxacin |
AUC24/MIC ≥125 |
Gram-negative infections |
[12] |
Note: The 2020 ASHP/IDSA/SIDP vancomycin consensus guidelines recommend AUC-guided dosing (AUC
24/MIC 400–600) over trough-based monitoring for serious MRSA infections.
5 Fluoroquinolone AUC/MIC targets were derived from critically ill patient outcomes data.
Table 3: Concentration-Dependent Killing (Cmax/MIC)
Aminoglycosides
| Drug |
PK/PD Target |
Typical Cmax Goal |
Ref |
| Gentamicin |
Cmax/MIC ≥8–10 |
8–10 mcg/mL |
[14], [15] |
| Tobramycin |
Cmax/MIC ≥8–10 |
8–10 mcg/mL |
[14], [15] |
| Amikacin |
Cmax/MIC ≥8–10 |
25–30 mcg/mL |
[14], [15] |
Note: Aminoglycosides exhibit concentration-dependent killing with a significant post-antibiotic effect (PAE). Extended-interval (once-daily) dosing leverages both properties by maximizing Cmax/MIC while allowing drug-free intervals for reduced nephrotoxicity.
References
- Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26(1):1–10. [PubMed]
- Drusano GL. Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of ‘bug and drug.’ Nat Rev Microbiol 2004;2(4):289–300. [PubMed]
- Ambrose PG, Bhavnani SM, Rubino CM, et al. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy: it’s not just for mice anymore. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44(1):79–86. [PubMed]
- Lodise TP, Lomaestro B, Drusano GL. Piperacillin-tazobactam for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: clinical implications of an extended-infusion dosing strategy. Pharmacotherapy 2006;26(2):231–238. [PubMed]
- Rybak MJ, Le J, Lodise TP, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a revised consensus guideline and review by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2020;77(11):835–864. [PubMed]
- Crandon JL, Bulik CC, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Clinical pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54(3):1111–1116. [PubMed]
- Lepak AJ, Andes DR. In vivo pharmacodynamic target assessment of ceftolozane combined with tazobactam against gram-negative organisms using the murine thigh infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58(10):6091–6096. [PubMed]
- Nakamura R, Ito-Horiyama T, Takemura M, et al. In vivo pharmacodynamic study of cefiderocol, a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin, in murine thigh and lung infection models. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019;63(9):e02031-18. [PubMed]
- Tam VH, Schilling AN, Nikolaou M. Modelling time-kill studies to discern the pharmacodynamics of meropenem. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;55(5):699–706. [PubMed]
- Safdar N, Andes D, Craig WA. In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of daptomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48(1):63–68. [PubMed]
- Rayner CR, Forrest A, Meagher AK, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ. Clinical pharmacodynamics of linezolid in seriously ill patients treated in a compassionate use programme. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003;42(15):1411–1423. [PubMed]
- Forrest A, Nix DE, Ballow CH, Goss TF, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ. Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37(5):1073–1081. [PubMed]
- Ambrose PG, Grasela DM, Grasela TH, Passarell J, Mayer HB, Pierce PF. Pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45(10):2793–2797. [PubMed]
- Moore RD, Lietman PS, Smith CR. Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration. J Infect Dis 1987;155(1):93–99. [PubMed]
- Kashuba AD, Nafziger AN, Drusano GL, Bertino JS Jr. Optimizing aminoglycoside therapy for nosocomial pneumonia caused by gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43(3):623–629. [PubMed]